小鱼可能

为什么外星人只是可能没有使我们的领域非常设计

几年前,我问比利·麦尔有关麦田怪圈现象。亚博捕鱼技巧在90年代后期,我已经表达了我的看法UFO杂志文章他们似乎他们是由“某人”,意思是外星人,谁在创造性地使用力量而不做伤害给我们一些教训。

Since the appearance of crop circles, there’s been much conjecture, outright hoaxing, mysterious lights, certainty among some that there are very intelligent, extraterrestrial beings sending us encoded and/or cryptic messages, etc. Billy Meier and the Plejaren are on record as saying that most are manmade, which has certainly aroused some ire. Also, Ptaah had once remarked that如果任何是由外星人制造的,他们是一种非常间接的,无效的方式来沟通任何重要的事情,而不是直接联系地球上的人,告诉我们他们说什么。

但要回到我和梅耶尔的谈话,他告诉了我一些非常有趣的。他说过创作本身发出某些种类由高度敏感的,艺术的人,谁是正是如此灵感,创造出这些设计本身,它占大多数麦田怪圈的回升冲动。

我已经很难与解释...直到我发现了花式鳍工作小河豚的故事当我怀着敬畏的心情看着这造物的奇迹终于在海底完成了它的小小杰作时,我想它只是可以有可能的是人类与提供给他们(手在最低限度,同志和计算机等的手指,电路板和绳索)远远更多的资源可以利用自己的能力带来的冲击启示完整的艺术表现力。虽然在粮食领域的工作可能有其自身的挑战,我不知道如果一个人实际上可能使这样一个微妙的杰作海底,如河豚鱼确实非常自然,几乎不费吹灰之力。

当然,我们知道只用一只手是谁的,不仅显着多产,但谁也创造了一个非常革命性的,明确的设计和坚实的基础在人的意识中最深刻的演变的人。因此,也许我们可以从这个小河豚和先知都有点灵感和创造力,生产力和......没有坏处。

54回答“会的小鱼”

  1. 我只想问一个愚蠢的问题。微波爆炸或探地雷达的声音像声纳一样真的很快吗?这两种基于地球的技术听起来像昴宿星宇宙飞船的部分录音吗?

    1. 嗨希拉,

      这是一本关于鱼线奇怪的,两部分的问题,但不是所有的“傻”,IMO。您的问题几乎总是比较灵通,富有想象力的和非常有用的。你太谦虚了 - 近乎可怕的“谦卑”。

      你问,“难道微波爆发或地面穿透雷达声如声纳得很快?”

      “好像是”?是啊。一点点。我应该知道。

      I deduced that the powerful (200 mile radius) “search” radar component of my (Stuttgart based) Air Traffic Control USAF radar unit* should – in theory – generate a audible tone within one’s head, consistent with the “PRF” (Pulse Repetition Frequency) of the focussed radar beam. And, as long at the exposure was brief it would most probably be (relatively) safe.

      我认为,针对微波炉泄漏的严重安全警告可能是由律师的范围要求。

      Since I’d already experimented with the heating characteristics of the emitted microwaves, useful for warming salami sandwiches and frozen feet (without having to go through the laborious procedure of removing and replacing my snow-covered outer rubber boots and combat boots first), when I was a just foolish teenager (as opposed to the foolish sexagenarian I am now) and figured my chances of survival while in the inescapably steely grip of my homicidal maniac uncle (Sam) were slim at best anyway, I made a sacrifice for science, so to speak, and late one dark and lonely night, without first turning off the transmitter as safety rules required, I stopped the rotation of the big parabolic reflector up on the roof of the unit, climbed the integral steel ladder to the roof, bent my head directly into the radar beam, and – exactly as I had predicted – “heard”, from deep inside my head (not my ears), the characteristic high-pitched audio tone I knew to be the radar PRF. I also suddenly discovered that I possessed superhuman strength. And all the answers to life, the universe and everything had abruptly fallen into my lap. (Not really, that last bit was just a joke.)

      我认出了口气的原因,是因为我经常会因为干扰从军用无线电和其他类型的音频无线传输的接收器来之前听说过它。我甚至偶尔听到它,因为从机场过来的电视新闻报道。每次雷达波束扫过,与抛物面天线的每一个(赫兹)旋转,你会得到一个特点有点高音调的“嘟嘟”声,而是更像一个小音无B和页。排序的“EEE(等一下)EEE(等一下)EEE”,等等。它具有较低的音调和持续时间比声纳的“平”,熟悉好莱坞的潜艇战电影大家。

      仅供参考,如激光和NASA,雷达和声纳是首字母缩写,是无线电探测和测距和声音检测和分别测距。这是总是在我获邀到各种时髦风雅政党的一个有用的话匣子。

      我想探地雷达采用了一系列的PRF,所以能够听到他们中的一些是可行的,我想,如果你不知何故不得不在路上你听到的,但不要尝试在家里。亚博破解版无限钻石我不知道,不觉得就像试图找出答案。我的头部空间现在被主要用于再度教导。

      你问题的第二部分具有更短的回答,“难道这两个基于地球的技术听起来类似Plejaren飞船的记录声音的部分?”

      没有。

      很好,希拉。

      干杯!

        1. 感谢您戴森为您解释和幽默感。如果我们不能使自己的乐趣,我们谁又能取笑?As you are probably aware, I’m still trying to figure out the crop circle that appeared here (not in the UK but in an area in Canada where only one other one was found in August of 2001 – the Star of David – 8 years prior). August 14, 2009 my neighbour just about woke me up at 1:30 am because she could hear this loud sound and was SURPRISED THAT IT DIDN’T WAKE UP THE WHOLE TOWN and was shocked that I slept through it. She was inside her house when she heard it and it was coming from outside the house. She described it as sonar going really fast (like your reference to submarine war movies or her reference to Captain Kirk’s tricorder). So it was by no means only in her head and went on for a good 3 – 5 minutes. Getting closer and louder, then softer as it went away. The crop circle was discovered two weeks later about 5 miles away from our homes. When I got her to listen to the recorded beamship sounds, she said parts of it sounded similar. That’s where I mistakenly assumed that it was the Plejaren making the crop circles. So in a question to Billy in which I stated that the circles symbolized planets and some sort of comet or meteor was coming our way, Billy’s answer was all crop circles are manmade. In a side note from Christian he says that 5% are of a technology not known. So then I compared the crop circles to the ones in Billy’s book, the radius were correct on two of them (7 metre) except one of those was in a clockwise swirl, whereas Billy’s were all in a counterclockwise swirl. Plus the really big one was in a counterclockwise swirl but with a clockwise swipe on one side of it. It really was my first and only crop circle rodeo. Interestingly at the time, a local cowboy poet came out with a poem about the elves running their chuckwagons around the circle. LOL…until you get into the contact notes and a recent question to Billy which says that they are lifeforms. In 2009 I did some major crop circle research (as much as one can on the interweb) and contacted Colin Andrews. Btw Paul Vigay co-author of that book you referenced mysteriously died a year or so ago…did he get too close to the shenanigans of the UK military industrial complex? In one of Colin Andrews crop circle films a farmer saw a dark tube coming from the sky, made me think they are using satellites to pull this off. Then you look at the recent California crop circle hoax where they advertised a new NVIDIA Tegra K1 chip in a crop circle. One only has to google advertisement in a crop circle to see all the faked ones. So obviously earth humans have the capability. But due to your explanations I can rule out the google earth trolls and the ground penetrating radar. Thank you for that.

          1. Eltjo Haselhof是死?

            他只有年轻。他有年幼的孩子。我觉得恶心。

            本卦是最常见的重复CC模式。

            去看看它是什么意思。

            http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/meier.symbole.htm

            请重新阅读:http://www.theyfly.com/concealment-vs-lies

            “但由于你的解释我可以排除......地面穿透雷达。”

            不,你不能。我写的,“我想探地雷达采用了一系列的PRF,所以能够听到他们中的一些是可行的......”

            但是GPR不能做观察到的所有其他奇怪的事情——不是对你的生活。

            我必须跑,希拉。我们正在采取的东西在2005年开始重新回到场上,我被迫敌对保卫容易证明的真理的环境非常非常的给它。我没有看到任何的Michaels的其他博客的是,我也不能在这里什么反应更加一会儿。但感谢你的鼓励(非常悲伤的消息)。

            “创新是真理”(OM)

            祝一切顺利。

            和平的智慧。

            注:你朋友听到的那种尖锐的、有节奏重复的声音,无疑是一块吱吱作响的木板,用一圈绳子固定住,然后有人用脚有节奏地按在上面。如果比利是这么说的,那这一定是真的,我们都应该盲目地相信他,不要再往下看,除非他说的读星术是真的,但在那个时候他错了。

  2. 迈克尔,

    快速看一下这个视频。在我看来是真的。我认为它显示了一个ufo形成了一个麦田怪圈。

    1. 托尼,

      难道你不知道Jmmanuel fortold和prophecised这些在TJ?

      第3章:
      17.“所以,当人类开始领悟,而当它应是
      谷壳被从晶粒分离。

      18.“那将是当你的虚假教导被嘲笑,人类发现真相的时候。”

      19.“这将成为过去时,人类建立唱歌灯
      火,使他们能够逃逸到宇宙,正如上帝和他的追随者,天的儿子做的战车,

      20.“即那些谁教我们的智慧和知识创造的,

      21.“,谁劝我们要服从自然,并根据现场的法律
      他们。

      22.“哦,你叛徒,耿耿于怀,毒蛇的种类,从这个地方离开,
      因为你是不纯的,并在你的错误教导诅咒。

      23.“从这个地方走开,因为我可以用我自己的协议洗礼
      用水就能叫你们悔改。但那在我以后来的,就是神
      比我强,我不值得他取出凉鞋。他会的
      你们施洗精神的知识和真理之火。

      24.他手里拿着簸箕。他会扫他的谷
      地板和收集小麦进他的粮仓,但他会烧掉谷壳
      用不灭的火。

      25.“谎言永远无法承受的事实,这破坏了邪恶的火。”

      26.施洗约翰因此发言,不料,Jmmanuel加利利然后
      在乔丹走近约翰,要受他洗。

      27.约翰,然而,拒绝了他并谈到,“这是我谁必须
      由你的洗礼,因为你拥有比一,而你更深入的了解
      过来?”

      28.但是Jmmanuel回答说,“我们现在发生如此,因为它是
      我们装修完成所有主持正义的,因为我们是地球的两个儿子“。

      29.因此,约翰同意和他命名。

      ___

      谁曾想到字面上什么,谷壳与麦田怪圈?

        1. 希拉,认为它是这样的......我也不会吃饱,而刻录戴森已经与问候提到的那些与董事会和绳索amatuers显然做的麦田怪圈的类型小麦秸秆。I don’t know if it’s healthy or not but I wouldn’t take a chance to put into the food chain if I see circular holes in the wheat, varying levels of growth as if the wheat got pulled, and growing laterally in a circle thanks to some fancy energy discharge.

          1. 我敢肯定,小麦已经使得它进入食物链,它被切割下来,3年多前处理。但要知道,你是从哪里来的。我更可能不要吃它,由于它是转基因生物围拢小麦内嵌有所有的二恶英和我过敏二恶英

          2. 它被刻意集中和实验吃掉,据说是无害的,但坏味道(烧)。

            他们希望我们厂吧。(见上文Levengood纸)

    2. 喜迈克尔,

      这里有一个关于你可能想快速浏览一下在麦田怪圈另一个视频。

  3. 迈克尔,

    你写了:

    “迈耶和Plejaren都记录在案的话说,大部分都是人造的,这无疑引起了一些不满。此外,Ptaah曾经说过,如果有正在被外星人做,他们是沟通东西的重要一个非常间接的,无效的方式,而不是直接接触地球的人告诉我们,仅仅正是他们有什么要说的。

    但要回到我和梅耶尔的谈话,他告诉了我一些非常有趣的。他说,创新本身发出某些种类由高度敏感的,艺术的人,谁是正是如此灵感,创造出这些设计本身,它占大多数麦田怪圈的回升冲动“。

    我相信这是事实。

    谁的解释是,你要接受,在P的和比利的,或一对夫妇翻译的。翻译是一角钱一打,并不能比较的诗和伟大的比利·迈尔。亚博捕鱼技巧

    1. 我不认为这应该是唯一标准。我们必须想清楚,并保持评估我们自己。更可能的是迈耶和诗是正确的。当然,他们可以修改自己的信息。让我们记住这是谁做我们能够知道他们说了什么,翻译...为止!

      1. 当然,我总是想通过一切。我会用PS和比利去。是的,我很欣赏的翻译工作,而是因为他们已经做的工作​​,并不意味着他们知道他们在说些什么。翻译是一件很容易的工作,任何大学毕业生很可能做到这一点。

        我为一体,毫无疑问,在PS和比利是正确的。

        1. 托尼,

          尽管是一个大学毕业,我发现翻译是极其困难的。虽然,我可能不是在棚里最锐利的工具。但是,与安东尼,它困扰我,我只能访问的哦,所以,珍贵迈耶信息5%。因为你会发现它很容易,也许你会愿意做出的使命了巨大的贡献,并翻译一本书?

          1. 托尼写道:“翻译是一件很容易的工作,任何大学毕业生很可能做到这一点。”

            所以这就是为什么我的同事和我都发现翻译比利的文本非常非常困难和费时!

            我刚从Medford (MA)高中毕业不久,就在时代杂志的封面故事中被发现,美国公立学校系统的令人震惊的低标准是“全国最差的两所公立学校之一”。

            我知道。

            干杯!

          2. 我同意那个!!!我是大学毕业,以及甚至不知道我会开始了!:)
            嗯,我想如果一个人在大学里主修英语和德语?或者某种程度的翻译,可能会更容易一些。
            然而,你将永远不会在一般的宗教和地球生命中发现中的基本缺陷脱身。这些东西总是会找到那里通过,无论给出了这些天所谓的“教育”的方式。
            我有时会很快离题……我只是在最近几个月读到美国大学生在偿还贷款方面刚刚超过了万亿美元大关。
            把人的债务生活,很少有机会使用我们了解了什么比付出自己一切其他东西。胡说!!

  4. 下面是最近歪曲比利我忽略了合格的语句的一些例子。而对此事的几个环节和亚博直播手机平台想法。

    2010年3月16日(FIGU论坛)

    “泽塔Reticulans(?)我觉得谁负责真正的(不是哄骗得或损坏)‘麦田怪圈’

    “Just to clarify: I don’t know for sure that the crop circles are ET, per se, since they might be from interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. But they are NOT (all) from regular (or Dark Order) Earthlings.”

    http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/11009.html#POST48357

    而我,又在回复MH,2010年3月18日,两天后。

    You continue, (I’m quoting you quoting me now) “and then ‘I don’t know for sure that the crop circles are ET, per se, since they might be from interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. But they are NOT (all) from regular (or Dark Order) Earthlings.’ is a bit confusing, as well as a bit self-contradictory.”

    这一个是更容易。It’s in the same way that various know-it-all skeptibunkers have split hairs with you and claimed that even if these so-called Plejaren zoom around in flying saucers which people can see and photograph, provide metal and sound samples for analysis and so on and so forth, THAT – in and of itself – does not PROVE that they are EXTRATERRESTRIALS, since they might be interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. I was simply trying to avoid falling into that one with you. Do you remember what Marcel Vogel said to the Japanese television interviewer who asked him – after Vogel explained what he’d found in the Plejaren metal samples he’d looked at – “So, then, are they … extratestorials?” Vogal smiled and said, “Well, they’re not from around HERE!” Maybe the gigantic field forms aren’t from ETs? But whoever or whatever is doing the “real” ones – well, they’re not from around HERE!

    http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/11009.html#POST48448

    如果任何人的兴趣的论坛搜索crabwood或chilbolton将挖掘更多。

    In a deliberate act of journalistic provocation – taking a leaf from Michael’s book where he used the unqualified statement, “The World’s Leading Expert on UFOs” as a clever way to prompt much-needed debate – on November 16, 2013, I mentioned the Reticulans here without mentioning that it was my own tentative and seemingly common sense conclusion based on all my many years of work.

    //www.gyivicsan.com/the-hillary-raimo-show-decoding-the-billy-meier-material/11/08/2013

    它没有人回应。

    因此,在2014年2月1日,我特意再次对迈克尔的新的线程试图在那里,他有效地打电话给我一个骗子,在公开领衔我披露项目证人的证词为“假”。- 意思是:“不是真正的或真(在反对的方式使用欺骗时已尝试)。”

    //www.gyivicsan.com/pretentious-profiteering-purveyor-of-all-that-is-bogus/01/30/2014

    http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/radar.story.htm

    It seems to me, since I’m not trying to be Meier’s media representative, that I should enjoy the same privilege – of being able to state my conclusions about CCs as “my truth” – like the astrology fans do here about their conclusions, which, unlike mine, seem designed to mix the Plejaren science of astrology with the Earth-type which Billy condemns. The difference I see between these two issues, neither of which Billy supports, is that only one of them (CCs) has any logical scientific substantiation (not to mention common sense) behind it.

    我欢迎并鼓励人们不要教条相信比利仿佛他是一个神锡被崇拜,我敢肯定,他不会希望出现这种情况。

    1997年2月3日,比利写道,“他们(“一个世界范围内的某些地球人的团体”)在与伪造麦田怪圈有关的事情上也不是无所作为,而且在大多数不同的国家也是如此。(我的帽子作为强调)

    http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/meierv7p438-444.htm

    “打假”?

    The fervour in which Billy’s ludicrous boards and ropes statement is being wielded against in-yer-face scientifically established hard physical evidence to the contrary, and Billy’s own statements about “grain circle counterfeiting” (“Kornkreisfälschungen”) – shows to me that we still have a very long way to go before we get over the idea that what “the book” (or Billy) says IS TRUE BECA– — — USE “the book” (or Billy) SAYS it’s true.

    干杯!

发表评论

您的电子邮件地址不会被公开。必填字段被标记*

本网站使用的Akismet,以减少垃圾邮件。了解您的意见如何处理数据